Discussion:
First Glider experiences and IFR trip in VMC - 5 Videos
(too old to reply)
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-11 04:19:45 UTC
Permalink
Been an awesome weekend in my committing aviation for me to make 5
videos! First three videos are my first glider experiences. Last two
videos are my IFR flight to and from Meridian MS

First glider flight. Needless to say, it's way more work then IA work
in my humble opinion. You are constantly flying the plane, no such
thing as "coasting" to look for the airport. You coast, you lose
valuable altitude needless to say. The videos outside the actual
sensation I hope will give the viewer a sense of what it takes to soar
the blue skies above.

Look Ma, NO Engine! First Glider flight - Part one takeoff to tow
rope release

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSFUm7K5sNU

The video above starts from take off to tow plane rope release.

My first glider flight After tow rope release to landing Part two -
air work to landing

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__IeMFHeAMk

This video above contains finding lift within thermals, stalls and
falls and landing. Approach reminds me of the space shuttle. Well
duh, I guess so since the shuttle is a glider :-))

My first glider flight - part 3 of 3. Watching takeoffs and landings
at Pisgah

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VS6rzkGFNwA

Gliders are stealthy. Video above speaks for itself. No tripod handy,
sorry for the jumpy images.

IFR flight from KMBO to KMEI with ATC COMS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bp8dkojCcJQ

Friend and I went to Meridian for breakfast in the above video. 7
minute video includes an aborted take off, enroute was timelapsed and
landing is wing view into KMEI.

IFR flight from KMEI to KMBO with ATC COMS

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9j2IcUVFWPo

Return flight home from Meridian in the above video. 8 minute video
includes screenshots of flight plan filed via Flight Aware, CRAFT,
airport diagram, take off, enroute timelapsed and landing KMBO. One
also has to "admire" the military hardware that I taxi by on my way to
runway 22 in Meridian *big smile*
Mike Ash
2010-04-12 05:14:47 UTC
Permalink
In article
<8e108718-904f-4ffe-a7c8-***@g30g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> First glider flight. Needless to say, it's way more work then IA work
> in my humble opinion. You are constantly flying the plane, no such
> thing as "coasting" to look for the airport. You coast, you lose
> valuable altitude needless to say. The videos outside the actual
> sensation I hope will give the viewer a sense of what it takes to soar
> the blue skies above.

Welcome to the quiet side of aviation. :)

Cool videos. Flying a glider certainly can be a lot of work, but it all
depends. If I'm drifting down from 6,000ft in the evening after a long
day aloft, I have a nice 40 minutes of so of relaxation to enjoy. Being
parked in wave is another wonderfully calming experience, and can
involve major climbs as well.

Any thought of getting your glider rating, or was it just a one-time
thing to see what it was like?

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-12 12:21:58 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 12, 12:14 am, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:

> Welcome to the quiet side of aviation. :)
>
> Cool videos. Flying a glider certainly can be a lot of work, but it all
> depends. If I'm drifting down from 6,000ft in the evening after a long
> day aloft, I have a nice 40 minutes of so of relaxation to enjoy. Being
> parked in wave is another wonderfully calming experience, and can
> involve major climbs as well.
>
> Any thought of getting your glider rating, or was it just a one-time
> thing to see what it was like?

Hey Mike,

The more I think, the more I want :-) It was an intro ride as the
pilot knew I love flying

What keeps me on the fence for proceeding as with any aviation
decision is the cost factor. The soaring club I went to in the video
was a 20 minute ride http://www.airnav.com/airport/MS08

but the better news is they work at an airport I could "almost walk
to" with two intersecting loooong runways at http://www.airnav.com/airport/6MS1

I can see what you mean for the relaxing downhill ride but the mental
exercise of imagining where the rising air was in relation to me and
the constant turning was a ton of work! I have to say a lot of this
probably was sensory overload due to my first flight and I am sure
will come second nature in time but how long it takes will be the 64K
question.

The pilot I was with not only knew, but knew which wing was affected
by the rise and sink. All I felt was the subtle bump.

I am curious though it seems that for log book accountiblty, that it's
the minimum amount of flights, not the time needed for getting a
rating? Pilot said to me 10 flighrs (vs 10 hours?)

I know I would need more then 10 tows to learn the art of being towed,
much less doing any fancy stuff like boxing the wake.
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-12 14:34:53 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 05:21:58 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:

--
Viva la mort! Viva la guerre! Viva la sacre, Mercenaire!
Live To Spend It ! http://preview.xrl.in/4z9q
Mike Ash
2010-04-12 15:38:41 UTC
Permalink
In article
<f90ce4b9-47d0-4c94-bee5-***@w24g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Apr 12, 12:14 am, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
>
> > Welcome to the quiet side of aviation. :)
> >
> > Cool videos. Flying a glider certainly can be a lot of work, but it all
> > depends. If I'm drifting down from 6,000ft in the evening after a long
> > day aloft, I have a nice 40 minutes of so of relaxation to enjoy. Being
> > parked in wave is another wonderfully calming experience, and can
> > involve major climbs as well.
> >
> > Any thought of getting your glider rating, or was it just a one-time
> > thing to see what it was like?
>
> Hey Mike,
>
> The more I think, the more I want :-) It was an intro ride as the
> pilot knew I love flying
>
> What keeps me on the fence for proceeding as with any aviation
> decision is the cost factor. The soaring club I went to in the video
> was a 20 minute ride http://www.airnav.com/airport/MS08
>
> but the better news is they work at an airport I could "almost walk
> to" with two intersecting loooong runways at
> http://www.airnav.com/airport/6MS1

If it'll make you feel better, I have a 90 minute drive to my soaring
club, and most of my fellow club members are similar. (The club is out
in Northwestern Virginia, and most members live around DC.) While I'd
like to be closer, the distance isn't a deal-breaker.

As for costs, it can be very economical, but of course it's still an
added expense unless you're planning to substitute glider flight for
some of your powered flight time. Training tends to be more costly
because the major cost is usually in tows, and you take a lot of short
flights to practice takeoff, tow, and landing. Once you get past that
hump, it can be extremely cheap.

I think you should go for it! But of course I'm biased....

> I can see what you mean for the relaxing downhill ride but the mental
> exercise of imagining where the rising air was in relation to me and
> the constant turning was a ton of work! I have to say a lot of this
> probably was sensory overload due to my first flight and I am sure
> will come second nature in time but how long it takes will be the 64K
> question.
>
> The pilot I was with not only knew, but knew which wing was affected
> by the rise and sink. All I felt was the subtle bump.

Just like anything else, with practice it will become more natural. It's
still mentally challenging to track the lift, work it, guess where it'll
be, etc., but that's all part of the fun of the sport. The feeling of
satisfaction you get from making it home after a long trip or coming in
for a nice landing after several hours aloft is fantastic, and it's
because of that challenge. It's always a little mysterious, but the ways
of the atmosphere will definitely become more familiar in time.

I was out flying on Friday. A Lambada motorglider (basically a fancy
composite taildragger with a feathering prop and very long wings) took
off a couple of minutes after I did, and joined in my thermal. I managed
to outclimb him... even though he kept his engine running! Quite an ego
boost there. (I was thermalling far more aggressively than he was.) So
yeah, it can be work, but it's satisfying work.

> I am curious though it seems that for log book accountiblty, that it's
> the minimum amount of flights, not the time needed for getting a
> rating? Pilot said to me 10 flighrs (vs 10 hours?)
>
> I know I would need more then 10 tows to learn the art of being towed,
> much less doing any fancy stuff like boxing the wake.

Glider training tends to measure flights, not hours, because of the
nature of glider flight. You can't do touch-and-goes, and the major
thing is takeoffs and landings. The FAA understands this, so their
minimum requirements for gliders are measured in flights. Same thing for
flight reviews: you get a choice of either one hour of flight time OR
three flights, which is nice if conditions don't permit staying up
during your review.

Just like powered flight training, the FAA's minimums tend to be well
below what the average person requires to be proficient. Flying on tow
is definitely extremely difficult at first, but it'll get vastly easier
as you practice with it. You're basically flying formation, and that's
probably not a skill you've developed before. New pilots tend to
overcontrol enormously and are constantly out of position. The good news
here is that it's much like riding a bicycle. Once you learn the
appropriate reflexes and train your muscles, it becomes almost
unconscious and the amount of effort goes way down.

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
A Lieberman
2010-04-12 16:01:31 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 12, 10:38 am, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
> In article

> As for costs, it can be very economical, but of course it's still an
> added expense unless you're planning to substitute glider flight for
> some of your powered flight time. Training tends to be more costly
> because the major cost is usually in tows, and you take a lot of short
> flights to practice takeoff, tow, and landing. Once you get past that
> hump, it can be extremely cheap.

I think it's way more economical then power. But not quite economical
enough for maintaining my own airplane and gliding. Sooooo, still
evaluating and getting more information from the soaring club, I came
up with the following and the questions I sent back to the club
member.

One time CMSS membership fee $ 500
Monthly membership fee $ 100 (primarily for
brief non-member instruction)
Quarterly CMSS Dues $ 120
Annual SSA Dues $ 64 adult ($36
youth)
Annual CMLF Dues $ 150

Per year (outside the onetime fee) it seems to add up to roughly $2000
round figures Are my computations out of wack below (per year)?

1200 for membership fee
480 for quarterly CMSS dues
210 for annual feels

Instructor time is 30 per hour and glider is 10 per hour.

Is the above comparable to what you pay in your club?

> I think you should go for it! But of course I'm biased....

I am really, really considering this option :-) If so, there will be
a Sundowner on the market pretty soon.

> I was out flying on Friday. A Lambada motorglider (basically a fancy
> composite taildragger with a feathering prop and very long wings) took
> off a couple of minutes after I did, and joined in my thermal. I managed
> to outclimb him... even though he kept his engine running! Quite an ego
> boost there. (I was thermalling far more aggressively than he was.) So
> yeah, it can be work, but it's satisfying work.

Very cool! You must be flying a very efficient glider. Is it one you
own or part of your club. Does it pay to look into purchasing one's
own glider? The tandem glider I was in sure looked well equipped!

> Glider training tends to measure flights, not hours, because of the
> nature of glider flight. You can't do touch-and-goes, and the major
> thing is takeoffs and landings. The FAA understands this, so their
> minimum requirements for gliders are measured in flights. Same thing for
> flight reviews: you get a choice of either one hour of flight time OR
> three flights, which is nice if conditions don't permit staying up
> during your review.

I take it flight reviews are once a year then just like power?

> as you practice with it. You're basically flying formation, and that's
> probably not a skill you've developed before. New pilots tend to
> overcontrol enormously and are constantly out of position. The good news
> here is that it's much like riding a bicycle. Once you learn the
> appropriate reflexes and train your muscles, it becomes almost
> unconscious and the amount of effort goes way down.

Bingo, I could easily see me doing what you say, over controlling! I
did that over controlling part while flying the plane. It was easy
to keep that bug spot on the horizon for "level turns", but bank angle
without an AI, I found myself wandering all over the page.

Odd part was the glider I was in, the wings were so far set back I
couldn't see the wing tip easily during my turns without litterally
turning around. I didn't realize that I depended on the wing tip as
much as I do especially the down wing for marking the spot I want to
turn around.

Another "reversal" from power was no "stepping on the ball" but
stepping on the rudder the string pointed to for maintaining
coordinated flight. I think I was OK with that in my limited skillset
because I am pretty anal about keeping coordinated flight in my
plane. Just had to keep reversing my thought of stepping on the
string LOL
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-12 16:10:39 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:01:31 -0700 (PDT), A Lieberman wrote:
On
--
Viva la mort! Viva la guerre! Viva la sacre, Mercenaire!
Live To Spend It ! http://preview.xrl.in/4z9q
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-12 16:05:03 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 12, 10:38 am, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:


> In article
> As for costs, it can be very economical, but of course it's still an
> added expense unless you're planning to substitute glider flight for
> some of your powered flight time. Training tends to be more costly
> because the major cost is usually in tows, and you take a lot of short
> flights to practice takeoff, tow, and landing. Once you get past that
> hump, it can be extremely cheap.


I think it's way more economical then power. But not quite
economical
enough for maintaining my own airplane and gliding. Sooooo, still
evaluating and getting more information from the soaring club, I came
up with the following and the questions I sent back to the club
member.

One time CMSS membership fee $ 500
Monthly membership fee $ 100 (primarily for
brief non-member instruction)
Quarterly CMSS Dues $ 120
Annual SSA Dues $ 64 adult ($36
youth)
Annual CMLF Dues $ 150


Per year (outside the onetime fee) it seems to add up to roughly
$2000
round figures Are my computations out of wack below (per year)?


1200 for membership fee
480 for quarterly CMSS dues
210 for annual feels


Instructor time is 30 per hour and glider is 10 per hour.


Is the above comparable to what you pay in your club?



> I think you should go for it! But of course I'm biased....


I am really, really considering this option :-) If so, there will be
a Sundowner on the market pretty soon.


> I was out flying on Friday. A Lambada motorglider (basically a fancy
> composite taildragger with a feathering prop and very long wings) took
> off a couple of minutes after I did, and joined in my thermal. I managed
> to outclimb him... even though he kept his engine running! Quite an ego
> boost there. (I was thermalling far more aggressively than he was.) So
> yeah, it can be work, but it's satisfying work.


Very cool! You must be flying a very efficient glider. Is it one
you
own or part of your club. Does it pay to look into purchasing one's
own glider? The tandem glider I was in sure looked well equipped!


> Glider training tends to measure flights, not hours, because of the
> nature of glider flight. You can't do touch-and-goes, and the major
> thing is takeoffs and landings. The FAA understands this, so their
> minimum requirements for gliders are measured in flights. Same thing for
> flight reviews: you get a choice of either one hour of flight time OR
> three flights, which is nice if conditions don't permit staying up
> during your review.


I take it flight reviews are once a year then just like power?


> as you practice with it. You're basically flying formation, and that's
> probably not a skill you've developed before. New pilots tend to
> overcontrol enormously and are constantly out of position. The good news
> here is that it's much like riding a bicycle. Once you learn the
> appropriate reflexes and train your muscles, it becomes almost
> unconscious and the amount of effort goes way down.


Bingo, I could easily see me doing what you say, over controlling! I
did that over controlling part while flying the plane. It was easy
to keep that bug spot on the horizon for "level turns", but bank
angle
without an AI, I found myself wandering all over the page.

Odd part was the glider I was in, the wings were so far set back I
couldn't see the wing tip easily during my turns without litterally
turning around. I didn't realize that I depended on the wing tip as
much as I do especially the down wing for marking the spot I want to
turn around.


Another "reversal" from power was no "stepping on the ball" but
stepping on the rudder the string pointed to for maintaining
coordinated flight. I think I was OK with that in my limited
skillset
because I am pretty anal about keeping coordinated flight in my
plane. Just had to keep reversing my thought of stepping on the
string LOL
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-12 16:07:53 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 12, 11:05 am, "***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> Instructor time is 30 per hour and glider is 10 per hour.

Ahh, should add, tows were $10 per thousand feet up with a minimum of
1000.
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-12 16:11:22 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:07:53 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:

--
Viva la mort! Viva la guerre! Viva la sacre, Mercenaire!
Live To Spend It ! http://preview.xrl.in/4z9q
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-12 16:11:09 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 09:05:03 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:

--
Viva la mort! Viva la guerre! Viva la sacre, Mercenaire!
Live To Spend It ! http://preview.xrl.in/4z9q
Mike Ash
2010-04-12 17:58:50 UTC
Permalink
In article
<23e0212e-50e2-4a38-8495-***@x2g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Apr 12, 10:38 am, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
>
>
> > In article
> > As for costs, it can be very economical, but of course it's still an
> > added expense unless you're planning to substitute glider flight for
> > some of your powered flight time. Training tends to be more costly
> > because the major cost is usually in tows, and you take a lot of short
> > flights to practice takeoff, tow, and landing. Once you get past that
> > hump, it can be extremely cheap.
>
>
> I think it's way more economical then power. But not quite
> economical
> enough for maintaining my own airplane and gliding. Sooooo, still
> evaluating and getting more information from the soaring club, I came
> up with the following and the questions I sent back to the club
> member.
>
> One time CMSS membership fee $ 500
> Monthly membership fee $ 100 (primarily for
> brief non-member instruction)
> Quarterly CMSS Dues $ 120
> Annual SSA Dues $ 64 adult ($36
> youth)
> Annual CMLF Dues $ 150
>
> Ahh, should add, tows were $10 per thousand feet up with a minimum of
> 1000.
>
> Per year (outside the onetime fee) it seems to add up to roughly
> $2000
> round figures Are my computations out of wack below (per year)?
>
>
> 1200 for membership fee
> 480 for quarterly CMSS dues
> 210 for annual feels

Based on how my club works (and this may not be correct), I think you've
misunderstood the monthly/quarterly fee structure. I believe you pay one
or the other, not both. In other words, they have a $100/month
membership to handle one-off deals like your intro flight, and then they
have a $120/quarter membership for people who stay with them long-term.
So your annual fees will only be $480 + $64 + $150 ~= $700/year fixed
costs. Of course, you should verify this with them before making any
decisions!

> Instructor time is 30 per hour and glider is 10 per hour.
>
>
> Is the above comparable to what you pay in your club?

It's fairly similar. We charge the same $500 initiation fee. Fixed costs
are a bit lower, at $364/year, which includes the $64/year for SSA
membership. Tows are somewhat more expensive for typical altitudes, at
$22 for the first 1000ft and $5 for each additional 1000ft. (At $10 for
a low tow, you should be able to do your training for significantly less
money than it costs at my club, paying a minimum of $22/flight.)

For time, instruction is free but our glider rental for the trainers is
$36-39/hour depending on which one you're in, so that works out to be
pretty much the same, and you'll get a better deal there once you can
start flying solo. (Our trainers are more modern fiberglass, somewhat
nicer than the Blanik you were in, which probably accounts for the
difference.) For completeness, our fiberglass single-seater is $24/hour
and our metal single-seater is $15/hour.

Sounds like if you do a reasonable amount of flying, you'll come out
cheaper than me.

> > I think you should go for it! But of course I'm biased....
>
> I am really, really considering this option :-) If so, there will be
> a Sundowner on the market pretty soon.

Wow, you sound pretty enthusiastic!

> > I was out flying on Friday. A Lambada motorglider (basically a fancy
> > composite taildragger with a feathering prop and very long wings) took
> > off a couple of minutes after I did, and joined in my thermal. I managed
> > to outclimb him... even though he kept his engine running! Quite an ego
> > boost there. (I was thermalling far more aggressively than he was.) So
> > yeah, it can be work, but it's satisfying work.
>
> Very cool! You must be flying a very efficient glider. Is it one
> you
> own or part of your club. Does it pay to look into purchasing one's
> own glider? The tandem glider I was in sure looked well equipped!

I own my own glider in a partnership with two other pilots (one of whom
never flies it). It is a *very* nice machine, best glide ratio of about
42:1, retractable gear, flaps. It's an ASW-20, which was the reigning
15m racing champion in the late 70s through the 80s. More info and
pictures here:

http://mikeash.com/my_glider.html

The main reason I was able to outclimb him was just because I was making
steep turns at about 45kts, and he was making very shallow turns at a
faster speed, so I was deep in the strong core of the thermal but he was
along the outside where it was much weaker.

Does it pay to buy your own? No doubt it depends on the individual, but
in my case, yes, definitely. I flew over 50 hours last year and my share
of the glider's costs was only about $700. (That's split about evenly
between hangar and insurance, with a little bit extra for the annual and
various miscellaneous purchases.) That's way cheaper than it would cost
me to rent the club's fiberglass single-seater, it's a *much* nicer
aircraft, and I can stay up as long as I want (and am able) on good days
instead of having to bring it down for the next guy.

If you're interested, I wrote up a more extensive evaluation of my first
year of ownership a few months ago:

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.student/msg/084781ed52ebae2f

Glider pilots who buy their own glider almost always buy a
single-seater. Lots of newcomers think about buying two-seaters so they
can take passengers, but for most people that doesn't end up being
worthwhile. For me, I can give rides in club equipment when it comes up,
and I end up doing most of my flying alone. Hard-core soaring isn't
something that typical people really get into. 30-45 minutes of tight
circling is about all most people can handle their first time, but I
want to fly for hours at a time. The single-seater is cheaper, easier to
assemble, nicer to fly, and performs better, so it works out well to
have that around for myself, and use the club's resources for guests.

> > Glider training tends to measure flights, not hours, because of the
> > nature of glider flight. You can't do touch-and-goes, and the major
> > thing is takeoffs and landings. The FAA understands this, so their
> > minimum requirements for gliders are measured in flights. Same thing for
> > flight reviews: you get a choice of either one hour of flight time OR
> > three flights, which is nice if conditions don't permit staying up
> > during your review.
>
> I take it flight reviews are once a year then just like power?

Once every two years, just like power. It's also tradition (but not
required by the FAA) to fly with an instructor first thing each season
just to make sure that you haven't forgotten how to fly, especially if
you haven't been very active over the winter as sometimes happens.

> > as you practice with it. You're basically flying formation, and that's
> > probably not a skill you've developed before. New pilots tend to
> > overcontrol enormously and are constantly out of position. The good news
> > here is that it's much like riding a bicycle. Once you learn the
> > appropriate reflexes and train your muscles, it becomes almost
> > unconscious and the amount of effort goes way down.
>
> Bingo, I could easily see me doing what you say, over controlling! I
> did that over controlling part while flying the plane. It was easy
> to keep that bug spot on the horizon for "level turns", but bank
> angle
> without an AI, I found myself wandering all over the page.
>
> Odd part was the glider I was in, the wings were so far set back I
> couldn't see the wing tip easily during my turns without litterally
> turning around. I didn't realize that I depended on the wing tip as
> much as I do especially the down wing for marking the spot I want to
> turn around.

You'll get there. When things are going just right, the glider simply
disappears, and I'm just flying free, with no conscious actions beyond
turning here, diving there, cruising over there. Things like detecting
bank angle or marking spots on the ground don't even come into it.

Until you reach that point, a handy tip: all of the instruments on your
panel are mounted using four screws arranged in a square. Line the
diagonal of a convenient instrument's screws up with the horizon, and
there's a 45-degree bank, which is usually what you want for
thermalling. Other bank angles can be approximated, less precisely, by
referencing off of that.

> Another "reversal" from power was no "stepping on the ball" but
> stepping on the rudder the string pointed to for maintaining
> coordinated flight. I think I was OK with that in my limited
> skillset
> because I am pretty anal about keeping coordinated flight in my
> plane. Just had to keep reversing my thought of stepping on the
> string LOL

Try to think in terms of stepping on the *base* of the string rather
than the tail, and then your old instincts should work for you. Or to
think of it another way, the string is an arrow telling you where to
push.

It definitely takes work and practice. I hadn't flown for over 3 months
over the winter this year, and during my first flight this spring my
turn coordination absolutely stank. I'm better now....

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-12 14:34:39 UTC
Permalink
On Sat, 10 Apr 2010 21:19:45 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:

--
Viva la mort! Viva la guerre! Viva la sacre, Mercenaire!
Live To Spend It ! http://preview.xrl.in/4z9q
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-12 18:37:09 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 12, 12:58 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:

> Based on how my club works (and this may not be correct), I think you've
> misunderstood the monthly/quarterly fee structure. I believe you pay one
> or the other, not both. In other words, they have a $100/month
> membership to handle one-off deals like your intro flight, and then they
> have a $120/quarter membership for people who stay with them long-term.
> So your annual fees will only be $480 + $64 + $150 ~= $700/year fixed
> costs. Of course, you should verify this with them before making any
> decisions!

Oh, hopefully what you say pans out :-) Thats affordable flying for
sure. I am waiting for the email from my friend.

> For time, instruction is free but our glider rental for the trainers is
> $36-39/hour depending on which one you're in, so that works out to be
> pretty much the same, and you'll get a better deal there once you can
> start flying solo. (Our trainers are more modern fiberglass, somewhat
> nicer than the Blanik you were in, which probably accounts for the
> difference.) For completeness, our fiberglass single-seater is $24/hour
> and our metal single-seater is $15/hour.

Wow, never realized there was a difference in composition of the
glider. They just repanted the Blanik so the eyecandy was real nice!
I was fascinated the body of the glider was metal and the control
surfaces were fabric.

> > I am really, really considering this option :-)  If so, there will be
> > a Sundowner on the market pretty soon.
>
> Wow, you sound pretty enthusiastic!

Ahhhhh YEAH! It really can't be describe in the text of words and
videos and like I pretty much said I hope the video captures the art
of soaring, just doesn't give that physical sensation that powered
flight misses. And being in tune with what the air is doing also is
my kind of flying, sorta like precision of instrument flying but the
instrument is your rear end instead of the gauges. Though, I did
enjoy that VSI going up faster then a good climb rate of my
Sundowner :-)

> I own my own glider in a partnership with two other pilots (one of whom
> never flies it). It is a *very* nice machine, best glide ratio of about
> 42:1, retractable gear, flaps. It's an ASW-20, which was the reigning
> 15m racing champion in the late 70s through the 80s. More info and
> pictures here:

That was another learning thing LOL as you probably could tell in my
video. Had no clue gear went up in a glider but makes sense for
purposes of aerodynamics

> http://mikeash.com/my_glider.html

WOW, NICE set of wings!!!

> Does it pay to buy your own? No doubt it depends on the individual, but
> in my case, yes, definitely. I flew over 50 hours last year and my share
> of the glider's costs was only about $700. (That's split about evenly
> between hangar and insurance, with a little bit extra for the annual and
> various miscellaneous purchases.) That's way cheaper than it would cost
> me to rent the club's fiberglass single-seater, it's a *much* nicer
> aircraft, and I can stay up as long as I want (and am able) on good days
> instead of having to bring it down for the next guy.

Now you are getting where I am thinking. I like the idea of ownership
for your very exact reason. Not having to worry about "schedules".
"Generally speaking" what is the cost of a glider (typical single
seat, middle of the road glider)

> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.student/msg/084781ed52ebae2f

Just got through reading your writeup and it kinda parallels ownership
of a powered airplane. Obviously my cost per hour nowhere near yours,
but mine would be comparable in savings when compared to renting the
same amount of flight hours. I am closing in on 1000 hours this
month of which 960 was in my own plane. You indicated 30 minute
assembly time. Do you have a trailer to haul the glider for your
flights. Seemed like at the field I was at, the gliders were already
fully assembled.

> Glider pilots who buy their own glider almost always buy a
> single-seater. Lots of newcomers think about buying two-seaters so they
> can take passengers, but for most people that doesn't end up being
> worthwhile. For me, I can give rides in club equipment when it comes up,
> and I end up doing most of my flying alone.

Very productive information as what you say above were my exact
thoughts. Do I need to be current in powered planes to carry
passengers in a glider though should that rare oppurtunity come up? I
was reading in the club meeting minutes online in order to carry
passengers, they needed to be "current" with a PPL license.

> Hard-core soaring isn't
> something that typical people really get into. 30-45 minutes of tight
> circling is about all most people can handle their first time, but I
> want to fly for hours at a time. The single-seater is cheaper, easier to
> assemble, nicer to fly, and performs better, so it works out well to
> have that around for myself, and use the club's resources for guests.

To be honest, when the hour was up, I was ready to come down but that
also would reflect my power flying limits as well. I felt though
after being in the glider from all the new information being taken in
that it felt twice as long trying to soak in all the new
information..

> Once every two years, just like power. It's also tradition (but not
> required by the FAA) to fly with an instructor first thing each season
> just to make sure that you haven't forgotten how to fly, especially if
> you haven't been very active over the winter as sometimes happens.

Duh, yeah every two years, not sure what I was thinking LOL According
to the club website, it's almost a 12 month season for gliding down
here so I may have a more extended season..

> You'll get there. When things are going just right, the glider simply
> disappears, and I'm just flying free, with no conscious actions beyond
> turning here, diving there, cruising over there. Things like detecting
> bank angle or marking spots on the ground don't even come into it.

Just like instrument flying hard to imagine to getting to that
point :-) but time does work in my favor.

> than the tail, and then your old instincts should work for you. Or to
> think of it another way, the string is an arrow telling you where to
> push.

This is exactly what he told me, the string is pointing to the rudder
to step on..

> It definitely takes work and practice. I hadn't flown for over 3 months
> over the winter this year, and during my first flight this spring my
> turn coordination absolutely stank. I'm better now....

Same in power flying currency, currency and currency builds
proficiency.

I haven't really researched the glider add on, all of this is new. I
take it no written needed since I have a PPL or will I need to take a
written test? Also is the rating add on given by a club instructor
that notifies the FAA or does the FAA have a DE come out when it comes
to checkride?
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-12 20:21:28 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:37:09 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:

--
Viva la mort! Viva la guerre! Viva la sacre, Mercenaire!
Live To Spend It ! http://preview.xrl.in/4z9q
Mike Ash
2010-04-12 22:08:13 UTC
Permalink
In article
<d388e94a-d220-4ade-9bb6-***@n31g2000vbd.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> > For time, instruction is free but our glider rental for the trainers is
> > $36-39/hour depending on which one you're in, so that works out to be
> > pretty much the same, and you'll get a better deal there once you can
> > start flying solo. (Our trainers are more modern fiberglass, somewhat
> > nicer than the Blanik you were in, which probably accounts for the
> > difference.) For completeness, our fiberglass single-seater is $24/hour
> > and our metal single-seater is $15/hour.
>
> Wow, never realized there was a difference in composition of the
> glider. They just repanted the Blanik so the eyecandy was real nice!
> I was fascinated the body of the glider was metal and the control
> surfaces were fabric.

Fiberglass started being used in gliders in the 70s and really took over
in the 80s. The exterior is so much smoother and it allows much better
control of shape that it's a huge performance win.

I think the fabric control surfaces are probably because aerodynamic
flutter is a major concern. Reducing the weight of the control surfaces
pushes up the speed where flutter will happen.

> > > I am really, really considering this option :-)  If so, there will be
> > > a Sundowner on the market pretty soon.
> >
> > Wow, you sound pretty enthusiastic!
>
> Ahhhhh YEAH! It really can't be describe in the text of words and
> videos and like I pretty much said I hope the video captures the art
> of soaring, just doesn't give that physical sensation that powered
> flight misses. And being in tune with what the air is doing also is
> my kind of flying, sorta like precision of instrument flying but the
> instrument is your rear end instead of the gauges. Though, I did
> enjoy that VSI going up faster then a good climb rate of my
> Sundowner :-)

I know precisely what you mean! I've tried and failed for a long time to
really capture on video what it's like to be there for real.

> > I own my own glider in a partnership with two other pilots (one of whom
> > never flies it). It is a *very* nice machine, best glide ratio of about
> > 42:1, retractable gear, flaps. It's an ASW-20, which was the reigning
> > 15m racing champion in the late 70s through the 80s. More info and
> > pictures here:
>
> That was another learning thing LOL as you probably could tell in my
> video. Had no clue gear went up in a glider but makes sense for
> purposes of aerodynamics

When you have so little drag, every little bit you can reduce counts for
a lot, and having a big wheel hanging out is a bunch of drag. Basically
every glider built with an eye toward performance in the last 40ish
years has retractable gear.

Think of it this way: at 42:1 L/D and about 750 pounds weight when I'm
in it, my glider is experiencing a mere 18 pounds of drag at the optimal
speed. Add just a few more pounds of drag to that, and you suddenly have
a big decrease in L/D.

> > http://mikeash.com/my_glider.html
>
> WOW, NICE set of wings!!!

Ain't it just? :)

> > Does it pay to buy your own? No doubt it depends on the individual, but
> > in my case, yes, definitely. I flew over 50 hours last year and my share
> > of the glider's costs was only about $700. (That's split about evenly
> > between hangar and insurance, with a little bit extra for the annual and
> > various miscellaneous purchases.) That's way cheaper than it would cost
> > me to rent the club's fiberglass single-seater, it's a *much* nicer
> > aircraft, and I can stay up as long as I want (and am able) on good days
> > instead of having to bring it down for the next guy.
>
> Now you are getting where I am thinking. I like the idea of ownership
> for your very exact reason. Not having to worry about "schedules".
> "Generally speaking" what is the cost of a glider (typical single
> seat, middle of the road glider)

Pretty much you can spend what you want. My 1/3rd share was $12,000, so
it would be $36,000 for the whole thing. That's a fairly typical price
for a glider of that era and type. If you want to go a generation older
or something a bit less high performance, you can get something that's
still pretty nice for probably $20,000 or less.

If you want to get an idea of what's out there, take a look at these
classified listings:

http://www.wingsandwheels.com/wantads1.htm

If you really want to go cheap, you can get a decent 1-26, an older low
performance metal design that's a ton of fun to fly, just doesn't go
far, for well under $10,000. Those will tolerate being tied out if you
want to keep storage costs low, or you can just keep the trailer in your
garage for free.

> > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.aviation.student/msg/084781ed52ebae2f
>
> Just got through reading your writeup and it kinda parallels ownership
> of a powered airplane. Obviously my cost per hour nowhere near yours,
> but mine would be comparable in savings when compared to renting the
> same amount of flight hours. I am closing in on 1000 hours this
> month of which 960 was in my own plane. You indicated 30 minute
> assembly time. Do you have a trailer to haul the glider for your
> flights. Seemed like at the field I was at, the gliders were already
> fully assembled.

Yep, glider lives in a trailer and gets assembled in the morning before
I fly. Trailer live at the airport, so I don't have to haul it around
unless I want to fly at a different airport. (Or I fail to make it home
and land out somewhere.) The club's gliders are mostly kept assembled,
although our fiberglass single-seater is assembled on demand as well.
I'd like to keep mine assembled if I could, but it would not fit in any
of my airport's hangars, and it would be extremely expensive even if it
did. Fiberglass gliders don't like being tied down outside long-term, so
it stays in its trailer. Having to assemble and disassemble each day is
not nearly as terrible as you might think, though. 30 minutes is about
average, with about 5 of those minutes requiring a second helper (if
it's windy, I can do it by myself if it's calm), and the rest being done
alone.

> > Glider pilots who buy their own glider almost always buy a
> > single-seater. Lots of newcomers think about buying two-seaters so they
> > can take passengers, but for most people that doesn't end up being
> > worthwhile. For me, I can give rides in club equipment when it comes up,
> > and I end up doing most of my flying alone.
>
> Very productive information as what you say above were my exact
> thoughts. Do I need to be current in powered planes to carry
> passengers in a glider though should that rare oppurtunity come up? I
> was reading in the club meeting minutes online in order to carry
> passengers, they needed to be "current" with a PPL license.

They probably meant a PPL-G. I think the FAA defines passenger-carrying
currency in terms of (forgive my probable misuse of terminology here)
category and class. To carry a passenger in a glider, you need at least
three takeoffs and landings within the past 90 days *in a glider*. You
definitely don't need to be current in powered planes, I don't even have
my ASEL PPL and I do give rides from time to time.

> > Hard-core soaring isn't
> > something that typical people really get into. 30-45 minutes of tight
> > circling is about all most people can handle their first time, but I
> > want to fly for hours at a time. The single-seater is cheaper, easier to
> > assemble, nicer to fly, and performs better, so it works out well to
> > have that around for myself, and use the club's resources for guests.
>
> To be honest, when the hour was up, I was ready to come down but that
> also would reflect my power flying limits as well. I felt though
> after being in the glider from all the new information being taken in
> that it felt twice as long trying to soak in all the new
> information..

I've found that my thirst for flight time has grown over the years. When
I first started out, flying for 30 minutes was a major accomplishment.
Then an hour was a major accomplishment. Now, 3 hours seems like no big
deal, and I won't start making a fuss until 5 or so.

> > Once every two years, just like power. It's also tradition (but not
> > required by the FAA) to fly with an instructor first thing each season
> > just to make sure that you haven't forgotten how to fly, especially if
> > you haven't been very active over the winter as sometimes happens.
>
> Duh, yeah every two years, not sure what I was thinking LOL According
> to the club website, it's almost a 12 month season for gliding down
> here so I may have a more extended season..

Note that unlike the currency requirements, flight reviews only have to
be done once every two years and they count for everything you're rated
in. So you can do a glider flight review and that'll take care of your
ASEL flight review requirement as well. And the checkride for your
glider rating will count as a flight review for your ASEL rating as
well, which could be convenient if the timing works out well.

Given how far south you are, I imagine they'd fly year-round, although
the lift may not be the greatest in the winter months. We usually fly
year-round here as well (although somewhat less often in
December-February), it's just that this winter had unusually harsh
weather for us. It's a bit tense to operate a glider with a 60ft
wingspan off a 75ft wide runway when there are 3+ft snow banks lining
the entire thing.

> > It definitely takes work and practice. I hadn't flown for over 3 months
> > over the winter this year, and during my first flight this spring my
> > turn coordination absolutely stank. I'm better now....
>
> Same in power flying currency, currency and currency builds
> proficiency.
>
> I haven't really researched the glider add on, all of this is new. I
> take it no written needed since I have a PPL or will I need to take a
> written test? Also is the rating add on given by a club instructor
> that notifies the FAA or does the FAA have a DE come out when it comes
> to checkride?

You wouldn't need to take a written as a transition from an airplane
PPL. (I'd have to take a written if I ever went the other way, though...
so unfair.) The checkride is done with a DE, just as if you were a new
pilot, although the DE will probably go easier on you when it comes to
asking you about airspace and other questions which he can fairly
reasonably assume you already know due to your PPL. If you think you'd
want to do this for real, ask the instructors at the club what people
usually do for their checkrides. Hopefully there will be a local DE who
is known to the club who can come out and give you the checkride in a
familiar environment.

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-12 22:31:11 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 12, 5:08 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:

> Think of it this way: at 42:1 L/D and about 750 pounds weight when I'm
> in it, my glider is experiencing a mere 18 pounds of drag at the optimal
> speed. Add just a few more pounds of drag to that, and you suddenly have
> a big decrease in L/D.

18 pounds of drag, that is an amazing number considering the amount of
surface area being exposed.

> http://www.wingsandwheels.com/wantads1.htm

Thanks for this link. Time to daydream a little :-)

> did. Fiberglass gliders don't like being tied down outside long-term, so
> it stays in its trailer.

Good to know this as I saw a couple tied down outside. Is it due to
extreme temps that it don't like outside for extended periods of
time? Down here, summer temps in the sun can reach 120 or better.

> Having to assemble and disassemble each day is
> not nearly as terrible as you might think, though. 30 minutes is about
> average, with about 5 of those minutes requiring a second helper (if
> it's windy, I can do it by myself if it's calm), and the rest being done
> alone.

Only downside to assembling down here is the 90+ degree heat along
with the humidity so I would be more inclined not having to assemble
it. This time of the year, no big deal, humidity at a tolerable
level. With this in mind, I'd be inclined to go with a metal glider
and try to base it at one of the 2 private airports near me. Some
real good information you are feeding me :-)

> They probably meant a PPL-G. I think the FAA defines passenger-carrying
> currency in terms of (forgive my probable misuse of terminology here)
> category and class. To carry a passenger in a glider, you need at least
> three takeoffs and landings within the past 90 days *in a glider*. You
> definitely don't need to be current in powered planes, I don't even have
> my ASEL PPL and I do give rides from time to time.

Good deal, saves me money in renting "because I have to".

> I've found that my thirst for flight time has grown over the years. When
> I first started out, flying for 30 minutes was a major accomplishment.
> Then an hour was a major accomplishment. Now, 3 hours seems like no big
> deal, and I won't start making a fuss until 5 or so.

Probably more like your bladder making that fuss :-)

On the average from your experiences understanding everybody is
different, what is the average amount of flights before checkride.
For my VFR it took me 60 hours but quite a bit of that was "voluntary"
just because I wanted to do better then PTS so I went out on my own to
practice. I'd suspect I would want to do the same for glider though
of course I can't go out on my own. Extra 100 bucks or so
instructor / glider time just to ensure safety well worth it to me

> ASEL flight review requirement as well. And the checkride for your
> glider rating will count as a flight review for your ASEL rating as
> well, which could be convenient if the timing works out well.

It actually does as my BFR is due in August of this year.

> December-February), it's just that this winter had unusually harsh
> weather for us. It's a bit tense to operate a glider with a 60ft
> wingspan off a 75ft wide runway when there are 3+ft snow banks lining
> the entire thing.

Something I never considered but looking the soaring website, I saw
pics of gliders landing on paved runways. I would have thought that
concrete would have been harsh on the wing tips. Is there
reinforcement on the wing tips?

> If you think you'd
> want to do this for real, ask the instructors at the club what people
> usually do for their checkrides. Hopefully there will be a local DE who
> is known to the club who can come out and give you the checkride in a
> familiar environment.

I plan to of course ask the club, but before hand knowledge always
priceless!
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-12 23:48:56 UTC
Permalink
.
--
Viva la mort! Viva la guerre! Viva la sacre, Mercenaire!
Live To Spend It ! http://preview.xrl.in/4z9q
Mike Ash
2010-04-13 03:39:38 UTC
Permalink
In article
<afcc8382-30a9-4faf-b0ee-***@w17g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> > did. Fiberglass gliders don't like being tied down outside long-term, so
> > it stays in its trailer.
>
> Good to know this as I saw a couple tied down outside. Is it due to
> extreme temps that it don't like outside for extended periods of
> time? Down here, summer temps in the sun can reach 120 or better.

I believe it's mainly that the finish doesn't like long-term exposure to
UV. The plane itself will be ok, but you'll need a (very expensive)
refinish job much sooner if you keep it tied out. Plus, minor incidental
damage from rocks, people stepping on things, etc. is much more
expensive to fix on fiberglass.

> > Having to assemble and disassemble each day is
> > not nearly as terrible as you might think, though. 30 minutes is about
> > average, with about 5 of those minutes requiring a second helper (if
> > it's windy, I can do it by myself if it's calm), and the rest being done
> > alone.
>
> Only downside to assembling down here is the 90+ degree heat along
> with the humidity so I would be more inclined not having to assemble
> it. This time of the year, no big deal, humidity at a tolerable
> level. With this in mind, I'd be inclined to go with a metal glider
> and try to base it at one of the 2 private airports near me. Some
> real good information you are feeding me :-)

Avoiding assembly is always preferable, of course, but it's not really a
big deal.

However, in terms of fun for your money, it's hard to do better than a
1-26. It'll be fine tied out, it'll cost very little, and it'll be
tremendously enjoyable. Won't go so far, but that can just add to the
fun and challenge for some.

> > I've found that my thirst for flight time has grown over the years. When
> > I first started out, flying for 30 minutes was a major accomplishment.
> > Then an hour was a major accomplishment. Now, 3 hours seems like no big
> > deal, and I won't start making a fuss until 5 or so.
>
> Probably more like your bladder making that fuss :-)

Oh, I have a tube that takes care of that problem. It's a literal
life-saver on long flights. Without it, the temptation to avoid drinking
is extremely strong, making it easy to get dehydrated and start making
poor decisions as a result.

> On the average from your experiences understanding everybody is
> different, what is the average amount of flights before checkride.
> For my VFR it took me 60 hours but quite a bit of that was "voluntary"
> just because I wanted to do better then PTS so I went out on my own to
> practice. I'd suspect I would want to do the same for glider though
> of course I can't go out on my own. Extra 100 bucks or so
> instructor / glider time just to ensure safety well worth it to me

I started with about 25 hours of airplane experience that was about 10
years old at the time. It took me 25 flights to solo, and another 50
before I took my checkride. The 50 post-solo flights was far more than I
needed, and I only took so many because I was a bit slow in getting all
of my ducks in a row so I could take it, and I was having fun anyway.

You should be able to go out on your own. Once you're proficient enough,
the instructor can sign you off for glider solo and you can go off and
enjoy yourself as you like. You can even, if you wanted to, buy and fly
your own glider in that state, although insurance will hurt more.

> > December-February), it's just that this winter had unusually harsh
> > weather for us. It's a bit tense to operate a glider with a 60ft
> > wingspan off a 75ft wide runway when there are 3+ft snow banks lining
> > the entire thing.
>
> Something I never considered but looking the soaring website, I saw
> pics of gliders landing on paved runways. I would have thought that
> concrete would have been harsh on the wing tips. Is there
> reinforcement on the wing tips?

There's usually something there to take the abuse, either wheels or
skids. For a simple landing, it's fairly standard to keep the wings off
the runway until coming to a complete stop, though, so they don't grind
too much.

At my airport, we normally operate off the paved runway, both for
takeoff and landing. We have an adjacent grass landing area that's
available in case the runway is occupied when a glider is coming in. The
club owns one glider that rests on a nose skid, and a few private owners
have some as well, and we land those in the grass preferentially to
reduce wear on the skid.

> > If you think you'd
> > want to do this for real, ask the instructors at the club what people
> > usually do for their checkrides. Hopefully there will be a local DE who
> > is known to the club who can come out and give you the checkride in a
> > familiar environment.
>
> I plan to of course ask the club, but before hand knowledge always
> priceless!

I'm glad you're finding my humble input useful!

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-13 05:17:13 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 23:39:38 -0400, Mike Ash wrote:
.
--
Viva la mort! Viva la guerre! Viva la sacre, Mercenaire!
Live To Spend It ! http://preview.xrl.in/4z9q
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-13 16:03:21 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 12, 10:39 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:

> I believe it's mainly that the finish doesn't like long-term exposure to
> UV. The plane itself will be ok, but you'll need a (very expensive)
> refinish job much sooner if you keep it tied out. Plus, minor incidental
> damage from rocks, people stepping on things, etc. is much more
> expensive to fix on fiberglass.

I guess the finish is not the same as a powered plane?

> However, in terms of fun for your money, it's hard to do better than a
> 1-26. It'll be fine tied out, it'll cost very little, and it'll be
> tremendously enjoyable. Won't go so far, but that can just add to the
> fun and challenge for some.

And my plan would be not distance anyway, just altitude and maybe some
endurance. Just the fun of flying pretty much what I do anyway when I
do my flights to the practice area and usually I restrict myself to 2
to 3000 feet. Friday is my dedicated flying day so whether I fly
power to the practice area or glider, almost seems like a no brainer
decision when it comes to economics. I am flying in the same area
anyway!

> I started with about 25 hours of airplane experience that was about 10
> years old at the time. It took me 25 flights to solo, and another 50
> before I took my checkride. The 50 post-solo flights was far more than I
> needed, and I only took so many because I was a bit slow in getting all
> of my ducks in a row so I could take it, and I was having fun anyway.

Sounds like the way I would want it :-) Slow and easy and really no
rush to checkride anyway?

> I'm glad you're finding my humble input useful!

So much so that I have contacted the club / instructor to get the
wheels turning for lessons :-)
Mike Ash
2010-04-13 18:33:08 UTC
Permalink
In article
<adafc8c9-b378-4f80-bea8-***@w3g2000vbw.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Apr 12, 10:39 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
>
> > I believe it's mainly that the finish doesn't like long-term exposure to
> > UV. The plane itself will be ok, but you'll need a (very expensive)
> > refinish job much sooner if you keep it tied out. Plus, minor incidental
> > damage from rocks, people stepping on things, etc. is much more
> > expensive to fix on fiberglass.
>
> I guess the finish is not the same as a powered plane?

It's typically gelcoat on fiberglass which is definitely not what you'll
find on a typical Cessna. I don't know how a composite powered aircraft
like, say, a Cirrus would compare. There probably aren't too many
Cirruses kept tied out in the sun either, though.

> > However, in terms of fun for your money, it's hard to do better than a
> > 1-26. It'll be fine tied out, it'll cost very little, and it'll be
> > tremendously enjoyable. Won't go so far, but that can just add to the
> > fun and challenge for some.
>
> And my plan would be not distance anyway, just altitude and maybe some
> endurance. Just the fun of flying pretty much what I do anyway when I
> do my flights to the practice area and usually I restrict myself to 2
> to 3000 feet. Friday is my dedicated flying day so whether I fly
> power to the practice area or glider, almost seems like a no brainer
> decision when it comes to economics. I am flying in the same area
> anyway!

You may find yourself wanting to go places after you get more
experience, but there's nothing that says you couldn't trade up later on
once you get the urge, if you ever do.

> > I started with about 25 hours of airplane experience that was about 10
> > years old at the time. It took me 25 flights to solo, and another 50
> > before I took my checkride. The 50 post-solo flights was far more than I
> > needed, and I only took so many because I was a bit slow in getting all
> > of my ducks in a row so I could take it, and I was having fun anyway.
>
> Sounds like the way I would want it :-) Slow and easy and really no
> rush to checkride anyway?

Precisely. I soloed in September 2006 and then spent the next six months
or so having fun, seeking out challenging conditions with instructors
and practicing things on my own. By the time the checkride came around
it was a piece of cake. Really, the only major thing a PPL-G gets you
over being a solo student is the ability to carry passengers. And while
I like giving rides, I don't do it that much.

> > I'm glad you're finding my humble input useful!
>
> So much so that I have contacted the club / instructor to get the
> wheels turning for lessons :-)

Wonderful! I hope it goes great, and please keep us updated.

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-13 18:53:33 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 13, 1:33 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
> In article

> You may find yourself wanting to go places after you get more
> experience, but there's nothing that says you couldn't trade up later on
> once you get the urge, if you ever do.

Which raises a question. Do you arrange for a tow plane at your
destination to get you back up in the air or have something ready at
the destination to trailer the plane back?

> Wonderful! I hope it goes great, and please keep us updated.

It's a student group, so I intend to share my learning curve with the
hopes I get input to making me a better pilot!

I do know that videos will be very limited in my learning curve unless
the instructor is nice enough to record. In a way I hope he does so
I can see what my mistakes are and view it "objectively"

As you probably could tell in the videos, recording me flying just
wasn't going to mix :-) due to me trying to soak everything in! And
as I always re-enforce is that safey comes well before the camera!
Mark
2010-04-13 19:32:35 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:53:33 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:
Mike Ash
2010-04-14 04:14:39 UTC
Permalink
In article
<ed6450a3-6757-4bc7-a8fc-***@f20g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Apr 13, 1:33 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
> > In article
>
> > You may find yourself wanting to go places after you get more
> > experience, but there's nothing that says you couldn't trade up later on
> > once you get the urge, if you ever do.
>
> Which raises a question. Do you arrange for a tow plane at your
> destination to get you back up in the air or have something ready at
> the destination to trailer the plane back?

The plan is almost always to do a round trip without landing, so come
back to the home airport. Of course, soaring is not exactly reliable, so
it doesn't always work out that way. If I don't make it home, the plan
is usually to have somebody come get me with my trailer. If I land at
another airport, I could have the club's tow plane come fetch me
instead. If I happen to land at another glider port, I could conceivably
get another tow from them, but there aren't exactly a lot of airports
with tow services around here.

Note that it's easy to stick close to home and virtually guarantee that
you'll never have to land in a strange field, if you should so desire.
It's only if you start flying farther afield that these things start to
come up.

> > Wonderful! I hope it goes great, and please keep us updated.
>
> It's a student group, so I intend to share my learning curve with the
> hopes I get input to making me a better pilot!

Excellent! My training was recent enough that I still remember some of
it, so I'll give what pointers I can, although I'm not an instructor.

> I do know that videos will be very limited in my learning curve unless
> the instructor is nice enough to record. In a way I hope he does so
> I can see what my mistakes are and view it "objectively"
>
> As you probably could tell in the videos, recording me flying just
> wasn't going to mix :-) due to me trying to soak everything in! And
> as I always re-enforce is that safey comes well before the camera!

If you really wanted to, figure out a way to mount the camera so you can
turn it on and forget it. But that may be a project to tackle after your
checkride....

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-14 12:16:59 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 13, 11:14 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:

> The plan is almost always to do a round trip without landing, so come
> back to the home airport.

Now Mike you see, I have to get out of the power flying mode :-) I
just "assumed" a landing when they said to another airport.

> another airport, I could have the club's tow plane come fetch me
> instead. If I happen to land at another glider port, I could conceivably
> get another tow from them, but there aren't exactly a lot of airports
> with tow services around here.

I have two airports literally within a rocks throwing distance. One
is very close to KJAN charlie airspace so that is used mainly when
winds are blowing out of the south.

http://www.airnav.com/airport/MS08 is the primary field they operate
out of.
http://www.airnav.com/airport/6MS1 is the second field.

> It's only if you start flying farther afield that these things start to
> come up.

I can see how this can come up, stretching the limits of comfort. I
don't stretch it too far on my Sundowner when I am in the practice
area and am expected to remain in those boundaries so I suspect I will
do the same in a glider. One thing for sure knowing me, the IP will
real close to me :-))) Of course I don't want to tie up that airspace
just because of my own ideas of safety sooooo... I need to learn the
proper protocol and nuances that glider rules may not be so apparent
as compared to power. It really intrigued me with that tandem flying
in the thermal! I wasn't quite sure who had the "right of way" and
the higher performing glider was below us and I was concerned more
then the pilot he would come up on us. I assume just like power, the
lower glider has the right of way?

> Excellent! My training was recent enough that I still remember some of
> it, so I'll give what pointers I can, although I'm not an instructor.

That's ok, the pilot I was with wasn't an instructor but the way the
video came out, you wouldn't have known it. His explanations made the
video! So, any and all input most appreciated! The more variety I
get in opinions, the better rounded pilot I can be.

> If you really wanted to, figure out a way to mount the camera so you can
> turn it on and forget it. But that may be a project to tackle after your
> checkride....

That I agree with and even now with my power flying, camera is
secondary.

I heard from the instructor by email late last night, as you explained
earlier club cost and related costs is less then the yearly tie down
at KMBO :-)))) I have to be voted in the club of course, but he said
if I wanted to start sooner to give him a call. They plan to fly
later this week and this weekend. You can guess what I will be doing
a little later this morning! I work Monday through Thursday and
Friday has always been my dedicated commit aviation day for the past 3
years.
Mike Ash
2010-04-14 14:22:41 UTC
Permalink
In article
<a60a4127-3d80-4373-b4b2-***@y14g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Apr 13, 11:14 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
>
> > The plan is almost always to do a round trip without landing, so come
> > back to the home airport.
>
> Now Mike you see, I have to get out of the power flying mode :-) I
> just "assumed" a landing when they said to another airport.

In decades past, cross country flying typically involved flying straight
out, going for as much distance as possible. As the machines improved,
distances got greater and greater, and driving many hundreds of miles
round trip for a retrieve became impractical, so glider pilots started
doing more closed courses instead. There are still some straight-out
events being held (such as the annual Dust Devil Dash out of Tehachapi,
CA) but it's not that common anymore.

> > It's only if you start flying farther afield that these things start to
> > come up.
>
> I can see how this can come up, stretching the limits of comfort. I
> don't stretch it too far on my Sundowner when I am in the practice
> area and am expected to remain in those boundaries so I suspect I will
> do the same in a glider. One thing for sure knowing me, the IP will
> real close to me :-))) Of course I don't want to tie up that airspace
> just because of my own ideas of safety sooooo... I need to learn the
> proper protocol and nuances that glider rules may not be so apparent
> as compared to power.

It'll probably take you a while, but you can be surprisingly far away
and still have no problem getting home. The usual rule is to use a 50%
safety factor for reaching the IP at pattern altitude. So let's say your
pattern altitude is 1000ft, you're at 4000ft, and your glide ratio is
30:1. That means that your 3000ft over the pattern will buy you about
15nm in the best of circumstances. Divide that by 2 to give yourself a
50% safety factor, and you can still be 7.5nm away from the IP and have
no problem making it home. And when you're 7.5nm out at 4000ft you will
feel like you're very far away indeed... but you'll eventually learn to
trust the numbers. It can be hard!

> It really intrigued me with that tandem flying
> in the thermal! I wasn't quite sure who had the "right of way" and
> the higher performing glider was below us and I was concerned more
> then the pilot he would come up on us. I assume just like power, the
> lower glider has the right of way?

To be honest, I'm not sure about right-of-way rules. I don't want to
have "But I had the right of way!" written on my tombstone, so I'll do
whatever it takes to avoid a collision no matter who has the ROW, as I'm
sure you do as well. Sharing a thermal is very much a cooperative
venture. When possible, you try to just keep on opposite sides of the
circle. That way you can always keep the other guy in sight, and if
somebody climbs or descends suddenly, you know that he won't get in the
way. Sometimes you might have 3 or more in the same thermal, and then
you just try to do the same thing, keep everybody in different parts of
the circle, separate horizontally or vertically as able, etc. If I ever
feel like the other guy isn't doing his part, isn't looking for me, etc.
(which is thankfully rare), then I'll leave and go find another one.

If you think sharing a thermal with another glider is intriguing, wait
until you share a thermal with a hawk! Communing with soaring birds is
one of the best things about glider flying for me.

> > Excellent! My training was recent enough that I still remember some of
> > it, so I'll give what pointers I can, although I'm not an instructor.
>
> That's ok, the pilot I was with wasn't an instructor but the way the
> video came out, you wouldn't have known it. His explanations made the
> video! So, any and all input most appreciated! The more variety I
> get in opinions, the better rounded pilot I can be.

Yep, having that CFI-G certificate doesn't automatically convey great
teaching ability, and vice versa. I know several local pilots who are
wonderful at teaching and who have just never bothered to get the
certificate. Not that I'm necessarily one of those, but I'll do what I
can.

> I heard from the instructor by email late last night, as you explained
> earlier club cost and related costs is less then the yearly tie down
> at KMBO :-)))) I have to be voted in the club of course, but he said
> if I wanted to start sooner to give him a call. They plan to fly
> later this week and this weekend. You can guess what I will be doing
> a little later this morning! I work Monday through Thursday and
> Friday has always been my dedicated commit aviation day for the past 3
> years.

Wonderful! I hope it all goes great.

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-14 14:36:56 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 14, 9:22 am, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:

> It'll probably take you a while, but you can be surprisingly far away
> and still have no problem getting home. The usual rule is to use a 50%
> safety factor for reaching the IP at pattern altitude. So let's say your
> pattern altitude is 1000ft, you're at 4000ft, and your glide ratio is
> 30:1. That means that your 3000ft over the pattern will buy you about
> 15nm in the best of circumstances. Divide that by 2 to give yourself a
> 50% safety factor, and you can still be 7.5nm away from the IP and have
> no problem making it home. And when you're 7.5nm out at 4000ft you will
> feel like you're very far away indeed... but you'll eventually learn to
> trust the numbers. It can be hard!

Uhgg a whole new set of "flight planning numbers". Other then the
usual flight planning that comes with power, it looks like above that
maybe additional factors need to be considered. May be a dumb
question, but do you plan for winds aloft factoring in the glide
distance. I assume L/D remains a constant or does headwind take into
drag consideration for computing distance away from the airport.

At Pisghah, pattern is 1000 AGL. I was also surprised the altimeter
was set at 0 and not at MSL before takeoff. One thing I didn't notice
before takeoff, other then insuring that flight controlls were free
and clear and altimeter set, is there a standardized preflight to be
taken (generally speaking, as I realize it may be model specific).

> way. Sometimes you might have 3 or more in the same thermal, and then
> you just try to do the same thing, keep everybody in different parts of
> the circle, separate horizontally or vertically as able, etc. If I ever
> feel like the other guy isn't doing his part, isn't looking for me, etc.
> (which is thankfully rare), then I'll leave and go find another one.

3 "in the wide open pattern" at KMBO gives me the willies in the
airport environment, can't imagine three in the tight quarters of a
column of air. I think I would find me another thermal myself knowing
me!

> If you think sharing a thermal with another glider is intriguing, wait
> until you share a thermal with a hawk! Communing with soaring birds is
> one of the best things about glider flying for me.

Now that will be a video that woud rank along the lines of priceless.
Also I envision a video circling below a fair weather cumulus cloud
being priceless. Is it possible to top out above the scattered clouds
or is it safe to assume that lift is lost above the bases outside of
course being in that column of rising air?
Mark
2010-04-14 16:44:08 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:36:56 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:

--
Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/
scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane.
And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine.
My website http://www.hosanna1.com/ www.myspace.com/gayincarolina
Mike Ash
2010-04-14 20:25:17 UTC
Permalink
In article
<22bfebb5-c834-4fc5-9d6a-***@f13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Apr 14, 9:22 am, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
>
> > It'll probably take you a while, but you can be surprisingly far away
> > and still have no problem getting home. The usual rule is to use a 50%
> > safety factor for reaching the IP at pattern altitude. So let's say your
> > pattern altitude is 1000ft, you're at 4000ft, and your glide ratio is
> > 30:1. That means that your 3000ft over the pattern will buy you about
> > 15nm in the best of circumstances. Divide that by 2 to give yourself a
> > 50% safety factor, and you can still be 7.5nm away from the IP and have
> > no problem making it home. And when you're 7.5nm out at 4000ft you will
> > feel like you're very far away indeed... but you'll eventually learn to
> > trust the numbers. It can be hard!
>
> Uhgg a whole new set of "flight planning numbers". Other then the
> usual flight planning that comes with power, it looks like above that
> maybe additional factors need to be considered.

It's simpler than it may look, because you can do a lot of the
calculation in advance. For example, I crunched the glide ratio in my
glider down to a simple 4nm for every 1000ft, counting the safety
factor. If I'm at 6000ft, I'm about 4000ft above pattern altitude for my
home airport, so I can be up to 16nm away and still be happy. To have a
backup in case my GPS falls over, 4nm is about the width of one of my
fingers on a sectional chart, so I can count finger widths as 1000ft of
altitude to any destination on the chart.

> May be a dumb
> question, but do you plan for winds aloft factoring in the glide
> distance. I assume L/D remains a constant or does headwind take into
> drag consideration for computing distance away from the airport.

L/D remains constant, but your distance over the ground will decrease.
Glide ratio is just horizontal speed divided by vertical speed. Say your
best glide speed is 60kts with a 2kt descent rate, for a 30:1 best glide
ratio. Now let's say you're facing a 20kt headwind at altitude. Now
you're only making 40kts over the ground, but still have a 2kt descent
rate. Your glide ratio over the ground has gone down to 20:1.

You can improve that a bit by speeding up. Your glide ratio in the air
will drop, but your glide ratio over the ground with a headwind will
increase because the extra horizontal speed helps you more than the
extra vertical speed hurts you, up to a point.

This web page illustrates how it all works and how you can derive the
precise speed to fly for varying conditions:

http://www.jdburch.com/polar.htm

The short answer is, yes, wind matters, and I'll be more comfortable at
a farther distance if I have a tailwind to get home, and will want to
keep it closer if I have a headwind. A major part of using a big, fat
safety factor in these calculations is so that I don't have to work out
the precise numbers. I can get away with being "a little closer" when
I'm downwind, and count on my extra margin to ensure that I'm safe.

> At Pisghah, pattern is 1000 AGL. I was also surprised the altimeter
> was set at 0 and not at MSL before takeoff.

This surprises me as well. Everywhere I've flown, the altimeter is set
to MSL, just like with powered aircraft.

> One thing I didn't notice
> before takeoff, other then insuring that flight controlls were free
> and clear and altimeter set, is there a standardized preflight to be
> taken (generally speaking, as I realize it may be model specific).

My before takeoff checklist is CBSIFTCBE, which is:

Controls (free... hard to verify correct when I can't see the tail)
Ballast (usually verifying there isn't any, but I may need some for a
light passenger)
Straps (locked and tight)
Instruments (altimeter set, radio set, transponder on, yaw string not
caught in the canopy, etc.)
Flaps (as appropriate for the glider I'm in... club gliders don't have
them at all, mine requires slight negative flaps to start with, moving
down to neutral at about 30kts)
Trim (takeoff position)
Canopy (closed and locked)
Brakes (check that airbrakes come out, wheel brakes on to prevent
overrunning the tow rope when it comes taut)
Emergency plan (a quick reminder of the various options and stages for a
takeoff abort, and of where the rope release knob is found)

And likewise, my before landing checklist is FUSTAL, which is:

Flaps (as appropriate for the glider and conditions, and review how
their setting will change throughout the pattern)
Undercarriage (if flying a retract, make sure it's down and locked)
Speed (pick an appropriate pattern speed for conditions, and fly that
speed)
Trim (to hold that speed)
Airbrakes (pop them out and make sure they're working correctly)
Look (for traffic, wind, people/animals/aircraft on the runway, etc.)

There are variations on these with different letters, but they end up
accomplishing the same thing. The same checklists work with just about
any glider (as long as you have enough mental flexibility to just skip
over steps like Flaps when your machine doesn't have flaps) so I just
memorized them during training and use them everywhere.

We also do a regular preflight inspection before heading out to the
runway, just as you'd do in a powered plane, checking controls, skin
condition, fittings, wheels, etc. We also do a positive control check,
where the correct movement of all control surfaces is checked under load
by having someone hold on to each one while another person moves the
control in the cockpit. This is extremely important when you're
assembling and disassembling these things regularly, as a control
connection will occasionally be forgotten or screwed up.

> > way. Sometimes you might have 3 or more in the same thermal, and then
> > you just try to do the same thing, keep everybody in different parts of
> > the circle, separate horizontally or vertically as able, etc. If I ever
> > feel like the other guy isn't doing his part, isn't looking for me, etc.
> > (which is thankfully rare), then I'll leave and go find another one.
>
> 3 "in the wide open pattern" at KMBO gives me the willies in the
> airport environment, can't imagine three in the tight quarters of a
> column of air. I think I would find me another thermal myself knowing
> me!

It's funny how much attitudes differ. It's all just a matter of what
you're used to. I fly in gaggles all the time, so it doesn't bother me
unless the other guy is not holding up his end of the bargain. You'll
get used to it with time. As long as everybody is aware of where
everybody else is, and you maneuver to stay in a good position, it's
fine. If things start to fall apart, then it's time to leave.

> > If you think sharing a thermal with another glider is intriguing, wait
> > until you share a thermal with a hawk! Communing with soaring birds is
> > one of the best things about glider flying for me.
>
> Now that will be a video that woud rank along the lines of priceless.

Oh, well, here you go:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZGeeYFO3HY

This is indeed one of my favorite videos.

> Also I envision a video circling below a fair weather cumulus cloud
> being priceless.

Well here's one, but you can't really see the cloud that I was under,
because I didn't point the camera up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pezQmGUJ9xg

> Is it possible to top out above the scattered clouds
> or is it safe to assume that lift is lost above the bases outside of
> course being in that column of rising air?

On a typical thermal day with cus (glider-speak for cumulus clouds), you
can't get above the clouds, because the clouds cap every thermal. In
theory you can continue the climb into the cloud, but this is dangerous
and usually illegal.

Very, very rarely you'll get an interaction of wind and thermals which
results in ridge or wave lift being created by the thermals themselves,
which allows you to edge out "in front" of the clouds and climb up
beside them. I have read about people experiencing this but have never
had the pleasure myself.

For those of us who fly in mountainous areas, it's possible to get above
the clouds when mountain wave is present, which is something I get to
experience a couple of times a year here. For example, here's a picture
I took in November when I gave a ride to my brother:

http://pix.mikeash.com/v/wave1109/IMG_0237.JPG.html

We're at around 10,000ft in wave there, and the clouds are at around
5-6,000ft. we got up to about 11,000ft that day, and probably could have
gone higher if I'd gone in closer to the wave generator, but I chickened
out at about 25nm from the airport and didn't feel like pushing it any
further in.

I made this video during a wave flight in June:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiqyqxeqzHs

The clouds there were at about 4,000ft, and I got up to 10,000ft. That
was a little nervous because I climbed up through a pretty small hole
and was afraid that it might close up underneath me, but I kept a close
watch on it and it stayed open.

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-14 22:33:49 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 14, 3:25 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
> In article

> It's simpler than it may look, because you can do a lot of the
> calculation in advance. For example, I crunched the glide ratio in my
> glider down to a simple 4nm for every 1000ft, counting the safety
> factor. If I'm at 6000ft, I'm about 4000ft above pattern altitude for my
> home airport, so I can be up to 16nm away and still be happy. To have a
> backup in case my GPS falls over, 4nm is about the width of one of my
> fingers on a sectional chart, so I can count finger widths as 1000ft of
> altitude to any destination on the chart.

Love it, fingers require no batteries :-) I need to keep this in
mind, though I am surprised you have a sectional onboard? No
indication a map was onboard but then again, I am too naive to know.
I know I will need to be very conscious of charlie airspace on
Friday. Of course instructor will be on board.

> L/D remains constant, but your distance over the ground will decrease.
> Glide ratio is just horizontal speed divided by vertical speed. Say your
> best glide speed is 60kts with a 2kt descent rate, for a 30:1 best glide
> ratio. Now let's say you're facing a 20kt headwind at altitude. Now
> you're only making 40kts over the ground, but still have a 2kt descent
> rate. Your glide ratio over the ground has gone down to 20:1.

Easy enough to follow but of course you **shouldn't** have to make
these calculations from the air I hope? Guess the key to not getting
yourself (myself!) in a pickle will be good flight planning with winds
aloft and of course pireps.

> This web page illustrates how it all works and how you can derive the
> precise speed to fly for varying conditions:
>
> http://www.jdburch.com/polar.htm

Bookmarked thanks. Is this stuff needed for the oral part of the
practical test come checkride?

> This surprises me as well. Everywhere I've flown, the altimeter is set
> to MSL, just like with powered aircraft.

I will question this on my FIRST lesson for Friday. Though I may not
need to LOL if the instructor shows me everything by the book.

> There are variations on these with different letters, but they end up
> accomplishing the same thing. The same checklists work with just about
> any glider (as long as you have enough mental flexibility to just skip
> over steps like Flaps when your machine doesn't have flaps) so I just
> memorized them during training and use them everywhere.

Good to know as this wasn't done. But it wasn't the gliders first
flight, as it was flown before I got there so maybe this is why I
didnt' see most of this? I will preflight EVERY time even if I land
and go back up. One never knows if something came loose. I do this
in my plane and see no reason why I can't take an extra 1 or 2 minutes
to trust but VERIFY. My plans would be to video this safety aspect
just as I did video my preflight on my Sundowner that's on my channel
in three parts.

> condition, fittings, wheels, etc. We also do a positive control check,
> where the correct movement of all control surfaces is checked under load
> by having someone hold on to each one while another person moves the
> control in the cockpit. This is extremely important when you're
> assembling and disassembling these things regularly, as a control
> connection will occasionally be forgotten or screwed up.

Yikes reverse rigging would make for an unpleasant surprise!

> It's funny how much attitudes differ. It's all just a matter of what
> you're used to. I fly in gaggles all the time, so it doesn't bother me
> unless the other guy is not holding up his end of the bargain. You'll
> get used to it with time. As long as everybody is aware of where
> everybody else is, and you maneuver to stay in a good position, it's
> fine. If things start to fall apart, then it's time to leave.

Like you said, pretty much what you are used to and with practice and
time it I am sure will become second nature. These guys talk that
they go "canopy to canopy" sometimes. Too close for comfort for me
but then again formation flight a different beast all together so
obviously their experience is talking in my eyes.

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZGeeYFO3HY
> This is indeed one of my favorite videos.

Tooo dayem cool!!! I know the video doesn't do the justice with how
close you were to the birds! Made me wonder what the birds were
thinking :-))

> On a typical thermal day with cus (glider-speak for cumulus clouds), you
> can't get above the clouds, because the clouds cap every thermal. In
> theory you can continue the climb into the cloud, but this is dangerous
> and usually illegal.

I would think VFR rules need to apply? Remain 500 feet below? I
wouldn't want to get sucked up into one so I know I won't venture any
closer!

> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiqyqxeqzHs

Incredible. How long did it take you to get up there? You had me
laughing tapping the altimeter like it's a gas gauge close to empty
trying to help the gauge register what you want!

I can say, I am looking at CU's way differently today then I did
before Saturday.
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-14 23:42:28 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:33:49 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:


--
http://tr.im/1f7r
Mike Ash
2010-04-14 23:58:08 UTC
Permalink
In article
<af03c30a-ca43-4ab1-a51b-***@g30g2000yqc.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Apr 14, 3:25 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
> > In article
>
> > It's simpler than it may look, because you can do a lot of the
> > calculation in advance. For example, I crunched the glide ratio in my
> > glider down to a simple 4nm for every 1000ft, counting the safety
> > factor. If I'm at 6000ft, I'm about 4000ft above pattern altitude for my
> > home airport, so I can be up to 16nm away and still be happy. To have a
> > backup in case my GPS falls over, 4nm is about the width of one of my
> > fingers on a sectional chart, so I can count finger widths as 1000ft of
> > altitude to any destination on the chart.
>
> Love it, fingers require no batteries :-) I need to keep this in
> mind, though I am surprised you have a sectional onboard? No
> indication a map was onboard but then again, I am too naive to know.
> I know I will need to be very conscious of charlie airspace on
> Friday. Of course instructor will be on board.

It wouldn't surprise me if there wasn't a map on the trainer, as they
probably keep it local. It's good to have when flying cross-country,
though, which is something I do a fair amount. Even if the GPS is
reliable and I can navigate by eye and memory, it's still good to be
able to look up CTAF/AWOS frequencies and such.

> > L/D remains constant, but your distance over the ground will decrease.
> > Glide ratio is just horizontal speed divided by vertical speed. Say your
> > best glide speed is 60kts with a 2kt descent rate, for a 30:1 best glide
> > ratio. Now let's say you're facing a 20kt headwind at altitude. Now
> > you're only making 40kts over the ground, but still have a 2kt descent
> > rate. Your glide ratio over the ground has gone down to 20:1.
>
> Easy enough to follow but of course you **shouldn't** have to make
> these calculations from the air I hope? Guess the key to not getting
> yourself (myself!) in a pickle will be good flight planning with winds
> aloft and of course pireps.

Well, with a good safety factor you don't need to run calculations, and
can basically just fudge the numbers. For example, if winds are 10kts or
less at altitude, I'll pretty much ignore them. If, say, 20kts, I'll
probably knock a few miles off my maximum distance from a target.

> > This web page illustrates how it all works and how you can derive the
> > precise speed to fly for varying conditions:
> >
> > http://www.jdburch.com/polar.htm
>
> Bookmarked thanks. Is this stuff needed for the oral part of the
> practical test come checkride?

Yeah, I think "speed to fly" is a specific item on the PTS, and it's
important stuff to know regardless.
> > There are variations on these with different letters, but they end up
> > accomplishing the same thing. The same checklists work with just about
> > any glider (as long as you have enough mental flexibility to just skip
> > over steps like Flaps when your machine doesn't have flaps) so I just
> > memorized them during training and use them everywhere.
>
> Good to know as this wasn't done. But it wasn't the gliders first
> flight, as it was flown before I got there so maybe this is why I
> didnt' see most of this? I will preflight EVERY time even if I land
> and go back up. One never knows if something came loose. I do this
> in my plane and see no reason why I can't take an extra 1 or 2 minutes
> to trust but VERIFY. My plans would be to video this safety aspect
> just as I did video my preflight on my Sundowner that's on my channel
> in three parts.

I'll do my quick CFSIFTCBE check every time, on the runway, right before
takeoff. For a more thorough walkaround and control check, once in the
morning is pretty standard where I fly, with some people doing their own
checks again just to be sure. If it's your personal preference to check
before every flight, then I'd hope nobody would be so rude as to object
to that.

> > condition, fittings, wheels, etc. We also do a positive control check,
> > where the correct movement of all control surfaces is checked under load
> > by having someone hold on to each one while another person moves the
> > control in the cockpit. This is extremely important when you're
> > assembling and disassembling these things regularly, as a control
> > connection will occasionally be forgotten or screwed up.
>
> Yikes reverse rigging would make for an unpleasant surprise!

Hooking things up backwards is pretty hard to do, but I think at least
on some machines it can be done. What's more common is just missing a
connection altogether. Finding out that moving your stick from side to
side has no effect would not be a whole lot of fun either.

> > It's funny how much attitudes differ. It's all just a matter of what
> > you're used to. I fly in gaggles all the time, so it doesn't bother me
> > unless the other guy is not holding up his end of the bargain. You'll
> > get used to it with time. As long as everybody is aware of where
> > everybody else is, and you maneuver to stay in a good position, it's
> > fine. If things start to fall apart, then it's time to leave.
>
> Like you said, pretty much what you are used to and with practice and
> time it I am sure will become second nature. These guys talk that
> they go "canopy to canopy" sometimes. Too close for comfort for me
> but then again formation flight a different beast all together so
> obviously their experience is talking in my eyes.

Sounds like a bit of fun exaggeration there. If you're both slowed down
and in a tight bank, you'll only be maybe 300ft apart, which could be
described as "canopy to canopy" in a hyperbolic way. Much closer than
you were in your video, at least. But not quite within touching distance.

> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZGeeYFO3HY
> > This is indeed one of my favorite videos.
>
> Tooo dayem cool!!! I know the video doesn't do the justice with how
> close you were to the birds! Made me wonder what the birds were
> thinking :-))

Yeah, it's funny how much smaller everything looks on camera. I've taken
so many pictures of GIANT AIRLINERS that came REALLY CLOSE and when I
look at them afterwards, they're just specks. When I'm there, I can
watch the individual feathers blowing in the wind and such. It is very
neat.

I think the birds usually accept me as just another one of the flock,
albeit a bit strange looking. If I get too close, or in a position which
the perceive as threatening, they will dive out of the way and depart,
so I know that when they're just flying around with me that they feel at
least somewhat comfortable with my presence.

> > On a typical thermal day with cus (glider-speak for cumulus clouds), you
> > can't get above the clouds, because the clouds cap every thermal. In
> > theory you can continue the climb into the cloud, but this is dangerous
> > and usually illegal.
>
> I would think VFR rules need to apply? Remain 500 feet below? I
> wouldn't want to get sucked up into one so I know I won't venture any
> closer!

VFR rules do indeed apply, but figuring out where the 500ft mark is can
be really tough. It's not unusual for me to just suddenly notice that
there are cloud wisps below me, and so it's time to leave.

I've heard of people getting sucked into clouds, but unless it's a
thunderstorm, you should be able to make a quick exit. Pull spoilers
full out, stick forward, and you can get your vertical speed up to maybe
100kts. No thermal will be able to counter that!

> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oiqyqxeqzHs
>
> Incredible. How long did it take you to get up there? You had me
> laughing tapping the altimeter like it's a gas gauge close to empty
> trying to help the gauge register what you want!

The whole flight was about an hour. I think the climb was around 30-40
minutes. I spent around 5 minutes on tow, and another 10 minutes
searching for the wave before I finally connected. Then a quick descent
at the end with full spoilers to get back down.

Tapping the altimeter is a time-honored glider pilot tradition that
you'll no doubt acquire with time. With no source of vibration to
overcome friction, glider altimeters tend to stick and will jump maybe
50ft at a time during a climb or descent. If you really need a precise
number you have to tap it to get it unstuck. It certainly is an amusing
habit, though.

> I can say, I am looking at CU's way differently today then I did
> before Saturday.

Yep, you'll never look at the sky in quite the same way again. I can
tell you that a fine way to make people think you're nuts is to point
out the window on a blustery, cold winter day with lenticular clouds
lined up all the way to the horizon and say, "Wow, what beautiful
weather!"

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-15 00:42:08 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 14, 6:58 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:

> It wouldn't surprise me if there wasn't a map on the trainer, as they
> probably keep it local. It's good to have when flying cross-country,
> though, which is something I do a fair amount. Even if the GPS is
> reliable and I can navigate by eye and memory, it's still good to be
> able to look up CTAF/AWOS frequencies and such.

I think where this new airport is, I really won't get situationally
lost as I spend many, many hours over the area even after getting my
PPL. Nice thing though is I will be able to admire the detail at a
much cozier speed. The 50 square mile reservoir makes an awesome
landmark to refer to LOL

> Yeah, I think "speed to fly" is a specific item on the PTS, and it's
> important stuff to know regardless.

I take it when you say speeds to fly it's nothing different then power
airplane with regards to VNE, stall, yada yada? Guess I don't have to
worry about Vx and Vy speeds LOL

I am sure the instructor will get me that PTS stuff for me when that
time comes.

> checks again just to be sure. If it's your personal preference to check
> before every flight, then I'd hope nobody would be so rude as to object
> to that.

I would hope not myself. Just a quick walk around is what I would do,
deflecting controls to make sure nothing is rubbing or come loose is
what I imagine.

> Sounds like a bit of fun exaggeration there. If you're both slowed down
> and in a tight bank, you'll only be maybe 300ft apart, which could be
> described as "canopy to canopy" in a hyperbolic way. Much closer than
> you were in your video, at least. But not quite within touching distance.

Guess maybe they had that camera distance syndrome but in reverse.

> Yeah, it's funny how much smaller everything looks on camera. I've taken
> so many pictures of GIANT AIRLINERS that came REALLY CLOSE and when I
> look at them afterwards, they're just specks. When I'm there, I can
> watch the individual feathers blowing in the wind and such. It is very
> neat.

Same for me in my near bird strike. Camera made it small yet just
like you, I could see the individual wing feathers spread in his
maneuver to avoid me!

> I've heard of people getting sucked into clouds, but unless it's a
> thunderstorm, you should be able to make a quick exit. Pull spoilers
> full out, stick forward, and you can get your vertical speed up to maybe
> 100kts. No thermal will be able to counter that!

If it does, next thing coming out of that cloud is baseball size hail!

> Tapping the altimeter is a time-honored glider pilot tradition that
> you'll no doubt acquire with time. With no source of vibration to
> overcome friction, glider altimeters tend to stick and will jump maybe
> 50ft at a time during a climb or descent. If you really need a precise
> number you have to tap it to get it unstuck. It certainly is an amusing
> habit, though.

Ahhh, ok! More learning to be had!

> Yep, you'll never look at the sky in quite the same way again. I can
> tell you that a fine way to make people think you're nuts is to point
> out the window on a blustery, cold winter day with lenticular clouds
> lined up all the way to the horizon and say, "Wow, what beautiful
> weather!"

I saw that in your video and meant to point that out being so cool to
see in the distance above the cloud deck.

And I was telling my wife this evening, "friendly clouds" with the
CU's building where as before deciding to take this on, I would have
called them unfriendly due to the inherited rough ride going through
them!
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-15 01:42:10 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:42:08 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:
.
Mike Ash
2010-04-15 04:21:52 UTC
Permalink
In article
<2a219031-92f3-4451-8463-***@u34g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> > Yeah, I think "speed to fly" is a specific item on the PTS, and it's
> > important stuff to know regardless.
>
> I take it when you say speeds to fly it's nothing different then power
> airplane with regards to VNE, stall, yada yada? Guess I don't have to
> worry about Vx and Vy speeds LOL

There are all of those (Vx and Vy are actually just best glide speed and
min sink speed), but "speed to fly" in a glider context usually refers
to the speed which gives you either the best overall cross-country speed
(when taking into account the time spent climbing in thermals) or the
greatest distance for your altitude, taking into account movement of
your local airmass. For example, if you're flying through lift, you want
to slow down. Through sink, you want to speed up. That's speed to fly.

> I am sure the instructor will get me that PTS stuff for me when that
> time comes.

I'm certain he will. No need to get to it all at once!

> And I was telling my wife this evening, "friendly clouds" with the
> CU's building where as before deciding to take this on, I would have
> called them unfriendly due to the inherited rough ride going through
> them!

As I like to say a lot, powered pilots see weather as a continuum from
awesome to deadly:

Awesome Bad Deadly
|-----------------------||-------------|

But for glider pilots, you end up with the first part being flipped
around:

Boring Awesome Deadly
|-----------------------||-------------|

There can be a sore temptation to fly on days that are just a little too
far over to the left to be safe. Of course, being able to evaluate the
weather and decide whether it's on the Awesome or Deadly side is just
another one of those that's covered in training. In a flatter area like
you're in, it ought to be fairly simple: if there's lift but also
thunder and lightning, stay on the ground!

Long story short, you're pretty much right: turbulence is often a glider
pilot's friend.

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-15 12:16:17 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 14, 11:21 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:

> For example, if you're flying through lift, you want
> to slow down. Through sink, you want to speed up. That's speed to fly.

Too funny, because to build speed you got to point the nose down!
Opposite of "instinct" kinda like on approach when the stall horn
starts chirping because of decayed speed, you point the nose down to
regain that speed.

> As I like to say a lot, powered pilots see weather as a continuum from
> awesome to deadly:
>
> Awesome              Bad Deadly
> |-----------------------||-------------|
>
> But for glider pilots, you end up with the first part being flipped
> around:
>
> Boring           Awesome Deadly
> |-----------------------||-------------|

Wow, nice perspective. Yes, awesome stratiform clouds would be boring
to the non powered. And those I classified to my wife as "friendly
clouds" LOL and always hoped to see a thin stratiform deck. Now,
looks like I will be cursing cirrus clouds for knocking down the
thermals!

> another one of those that's covered in training. In a flatter area like
> you're in, it ought to be fairly simple: if there's lift but also
> thunder and lightning, stay on the ground!

No brainer there but yesterday, there was unforecasted rain showers.
I wonder if the club saw that coming, which I would think so because
of the scattered nature but they came up in less then 20 minutes from
scattered fair weather CU's to big gloppy rain producing clouds.
Winds also kicked up quickly.
Mike Ash
2010-04-15 14:14:01 UTC
Permalink
In article
<cc2d35bc-ace8-403b-8d8b-***@x7g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Apr 14, 11:21 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
>
> > For example, if you're flying through lift, you want
> > to slow down. Through sink, you want to speed up. That's speed to fly.
>
> Too funny, because to build speed you got to point the nose down!
> Opposite of "instinct" kinda like on approach when the stall horn
> starts chirping because of decayed speed, you point the nose down to
> regain that speed.

Yes, exactly! It's a hard thing to force yourself to do at first.

> > As I like to say a lot, powered pilots see weather as a continuum from
> > awesome to deadly:
> >
> > Awesome              Bad Deadly
> > |-----------------------||-------------|
> >
> > But for glider pilots, you end up with the first part being flipped
> > around:
> >
> > Boring           Awesome Deadly
> > |-----------------------||-------------|
>
> Wow, nice perspective. Yes, awesome stratiform clouds would be boring
> to the non powered. And those I classified to my wife as "friendly
> clouds" LOL and always hoped to see a thin stratiform deck. Now,
> looks like I will be cursing cirrus clouds for knocking down the
> thermals!

Cirrus... I hate cirrus! It's probably the least predictable element in
forecasting soaring weather for me. Looks like a great thermal day, go
out to the airport, bang, high cirrus overhead all day and you're sunk.
Fortunately it doesn't happen *that* often.

> > another one of those that's covered in training. In a flatter area like
> > you're in, it ought to be fairly simple: if there's lift but also
> > thunder and lightning, stay on the ground!
>
> No brainer there but yesterday, there was unforecasted rain showers.
> I wonder if the club saw that coming, which I would think so because
> of the scattered nature but they came up in less then 20 minutes from
> scattered fair weather CU's to big gloppy rain producing clouds.
> Winds also kicked up quickly.

Interesting. I'm not sure if I've ever been surprised by rain here. We
usually see it on the radar ahead of time, and on nice days it's not a
problem. Might be because of different regional effects, or just luck of
the draw.

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-15 16:19:15 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 15, 9:14 am, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:

> Cirrus... I hate cirrus! It's probably the least predictable element in
> forecasting soaring weather for me. Looks like a great thermal day, go
> out to the airport, bang, high cirrus overhead all day and you're sunk.
> Fortunately it doesn't happen *that* often.

And that was something new to me. I would have never thought
something located 30K would have such an effect on thermals. Stuff is
paper thin!

> Interesting. I'm not sure if I've ever been surprised by rain here. We
> usually see it on the radar ahead of time, and on nice days it's not a
> problem. Might be because of different regional effects, or just luck of
> the draw.

Regional effect I would bet, very common here but not this early in
the spring. It will be interesting to compare times of the day with
you for "best soaring times" when I get into this full swing. My
guess here is that things start warming up 9'sh and by 11, we see
pretty widespread CU's For power flight, I never launch after 10 with
new passengers because heating cranks up. And when things start
popping like yesterday, with power, very easy to navigate between the
rain shafts.

Tomorrow should be my first formal lesson I hope. I am finding these
guys love eating and usually plan flights around meals :-) so I will
get to meet more people.
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-15 16:46:57 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 09:19:15 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:

--
email: ***@insightbb.com
Mike Ash
2010-04-16 02:39:25 UTC
Permalink
In article
<adc04248-afde-46aa-ada1-***@a9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
"***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Apr 15, 9:14 am, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
>
> > Cirrus... I hate cirrus! It's probably the least predictable element in
> > forecasting soaring weather for me. Looks like a great thermal day, go
> > out to the airport, bang, high cirrus overhead all day and you're sunk.
> > Fortunately it doesn't happen *that* often.
>
> And that was something new to me. I would have never thought
> something located 30K would have such an effect on thermals. Stuff is
> paper thin!

Human senses are usually logarithmic (like why sound is measured in
decibels) so a change that's visually small can still be large. I think
high cirrus can cut off 50-80% of the sunlight (numbers from memory,
probably wrong) which will have a dramatic impact on heating.

> > Interesting. I'm not sure if I've ever been surprised by rain here. We
> > usually see it on the radar ahead of time, and on nice days it's not a
> > problem. Might be because of different regional effects, or just luck of
> > the draw.
>
> Regional effect I would bet, very common here but not this early in
> the spring. It will be interesting to compare times of the day with
> you for "best soaring times" when I get into this full swing. My
> guess here is that things start warming up 9'sh and by 11, we see
> pretty widespread CU's For power flight, I never launch after 10 with
> new passengers because heating cranks up. And when things start
> popping like yesterday, with power, very easy to navigate between the
> rain shafts.

On a decent thermal day here, things get going around 12 and start to
become really good around 1, then the action lasts until about 5. On an
unusually good day, it may start at 11 or earlier, and last until 6ish.

> Tomorrow should be my first formal lesson I hope. I am finding these
> guys love eating and usually plan flights around meals :-) so I will
> get to meet more people.

I look forward to reading your after action report.

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-17 02:40:03 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 15, 9:39 pm, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:

> I look forward to reading your after action report.

Posted under a new thread Mike, Glider lesson experiences :-) Look
forward to your feedback. I am sure it will bring back those fond
days of training!
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-17 21:43:13 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 19:40:03 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:

Viva la mort! Viva la guerre! Viva la sacre, Mercenaire!
Live To Spend It ! http://preview.xrl.in/4z9q
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-15 16:46:29 UTC
Permalink
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 05:16:17 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:
..
--
yip nyip yiyap nyop *turn off the focken strobes* yip nyip yiyap nyop
Jim Logajan
2010-04-19 04:08:26 UTC
Permalink
Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
> In article
> <22bfebb5-c834-4fc5-9d6a-***@f13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,
> "***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:
>> At Pisghah, pattern is 1000 AGL. I was also surprised the altimeter
>> was set at 0 and not at MSL before takeoff.
>
> This surprises me as well. Everywhere I've flown, the altimeter is set
> to MSL, just like with powered aircraft.

Small datum: I know a tow pilot who sets the tow plane altimeter to read
AGL. He said it makes it easier for him to remember release height and
subsequent billing amount, since tows are charged at so many dollars per
thousand feet.

>> One thing I didn't notice
>> before takeoff, other then insuring that flight controlls were free
>> and clear and altimeter set, is there a standardized preflight to be
>> taken (generally speaking, as I realize it may be model specific).
>
> My before takeoff checklist is CBSIFTCBE, which is:

If I could remember an acronym like that, I'm not sure why I'd need it.
:-) I use AABBBCCCDE as a checklist reminder, since it builds on a
sequence I already know (though I've now thought of a completely
different system.)
(A)ltimeter, (A)irbrakes, (B)elts, (B)allast, (B)loody trim, (C)able, (C)
anopy, (C)ontrols, (D)irection of wind, (E)mergency review. (We didn't
have a radio at the time.)

> Controls (free... hard to verify correct when I can't see the tail)
> Ballast (usually verifying there isn't any, but I may need some for a
> light passenger)
> Straps (locked and tight)
> Instruments (altimeter set, radio set, transponder on, yaw string not
> caught in the canopy, etc.)
> Flaps (as appropriate for the glider I'm in... club gliders don't have
> them at all, mine requires slight negative flaps to start with, moving
> down to neutral at about 30kts)
> Trim (takeoff position)
> Canopy (closed and locked)
> Brakes (check that airbrakes come out, wheel brakes on to prevent
> overrunning the tow rope when it comes taut)
> Emergency plan (a quick reminder of the various options and stages for
> a takeoff abort, and of where the rope release knob is found)
>
> And likewise, my before landing checklist is FUSTAL, which is:

FUSTAL seems easy to remember, but the first time I tried to use it on
downwind it started coming out (F)uck, (U)h, (S)hit. Gathered my wits and
just started visualizing the glider, and mentally worked my way from the
nose to the tail (and looking at those components I could see) and
performing any tasks associated with them, including interior instruments
and controls. Works fine for takeoff and landing.

>
> Flaps (as appropriate for the glider and conditions, and review how
> their setting will change throughout the pattern)
> Undercarriage (if flying a retract, make sure it's down and locked)
> Speed (pick an appropriate pattern speed for conditions, and fly that
> speed)
> Trim (to hold that speed)
> Airbrakes (pop them out and make sure they're working correctly)
> Look (for traffic, wind, people/animals/aircraft on the runway, etc.)
Mike Ash
2010-04-19 14:04:50 UTC
Permalink
In article <***@216.168.3.30>,
Jim Logajan <***@Lugoj.com> wrote:

> Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
> > In article
> > <22bfebb5-c834-4fc5-9d6a-***@f13g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,
> > "***@gmail.com" <***@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> At Pisghah, pattern is 1000 AGL. I was also surprised the altimeter
> >> was set at 0 and not at MSL before takeoff.
> >
> > This surprises me as well. Everywhere I've flown, the altimeter is set
> > to MSL, just like with powered aircraft.
>
> Small datum: I know a tow pilot who sets the tow plane altimeter to read
> AGL. He said it makes it easier for him to remember release height and
> subsequent billing amount, since tows are charged at so many dollars per
> thousand feet.

Interesting. I suppose that the chances of him ending up at some other
airport are pretty small, so he doesn't have to worry about suddenly not
knowing his altitude relative to another spot. It would cause problems
at my airport, because we'll often make traffic advisory calls to the
tow plane with altitude in MSL ("I'm at your 11 o'clock at 3,500") and
that could become troublesome. Maybe not a factor where this fellow is.

> >> One thing I didn't notice
> >> before takeoff, other then insuring that flight controlls were free
> >> and clear and altimeter set, is there a standardized preflight to be
> >> taken (generally speaking, as I realize it may be model specific).
> >
> > My before takeoff checklist is CBSIFTCBE, which is:
>
> If I could remember an acronym like that, I'm not sure why I'd need it.
> :-) I use AABBBCCCDE as a checklist reminder, since it builds on a
> sequence I already know (though I've now thought of a completely
> different system.)
> (A)ltimeter, (A)irbrakes, (B)elts, (B)allast, (B)loody trim, (C)able, (C)
> anopy, (C)ontrols, (D)irection of wind, (E)mergency review. (We didn't
> have a radio at the time.)

I find mine to be pretty memorable. CB sift CB E. The "sift" is easy,
and the repeated CB makes them fairly easy as well. I'd say my club is
split about 50/50 between the CB... checklist and the AAABB... one.
Ultimately, as long as you can remember yours and it includes the
necessary items, that's all you need.

> > And likewise, my before landing checklist is FUSTAL, which is:
>
> FUSTAL seems easy to remember, but the first time I tried to use it on
> downwind it started coming out (F)uck, (U)h, (S)hit. Gathered my wits and
> just started visualizing the glider, and mentally worked my way from the
> nose to the tail (and looking at those components I could see) and
> performing any tasks associated with them, including interior instruments
> and controls. Works fine for takeoff and landing.

During my training, when I got to where I was starting to do the
landings, I wrote out STAL (no F or U on the trainer, and my instructor,
unfortunately, didn't insist on including FU regardless of the glider)
on a piece of paper and consulted it. My instructor advised that
entering the pattern might not be the best time to be fiddling around
with paper, so then I memorized it. I have a landing checklist in my
cockpit now in case I ever need it, but so far my memory has, amazingly,
worked.

--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon
a***@gmail.com
2010-04-19 16:48:28 UTC
Permalink
On Apr 19, 9:04 am, Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:

> Interesting. I suppose that the chances of him ending up at some other
> airport are pretty small, so he doesn't have to worry about suddenly not
> knowing his altitude relative to another spot. It would cause problems
> at my airport, because we'll often make traffic advisory calls to the
> tow plane with altitude in MSL ("I'm at your 11 o'clock at 3,500") and
> that could become troublesome. Maybe not a factor where this fellow is.

In my training I'd suspect another airport won't be a factor but there
are plenty of both private and public airports within gliding
distance. The gliders do make radio calls but only in the pattern and
talking to each other. I think the general consensus in the club is
set the altimeter to zero. Pattern is 800 so when planes are on
downwind, I'd suspect that one would expect to see them 800 AGL and
not call an altitude. Of course what you describe above Mike for
transients may cause a 300 foot discrepancy outside the pattern but I
would hope in the pattern it shouldn't make a difference..

> My instructor advised that
> entering the pattern might not be the best time to be fiddling around
> with paper, so then I memorized it. I have a landing checklist in my
> cockpit now in case I ever need it, but so far my memory has, amazingly,
> worked.

I think my instructor reads out of the same page. Well before pattern
have landing checklist done. Checklist for takeoff and landing is a
placard in the Blanik so no paper needed, I do feel empty handed not
having a checklist in hand! He has me fly 55 knots in the pattern
down to landing.
George Dance
2010-04-19 21:18:31 UTC
Permalink
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 09:48:28 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:

We warn you now not to steal or sell government secrets
or you *will* pay the price of having your arse violated rudely
by our covertly trained, butt-fucking pony.
Mxyzptlk
2010-04-14 16:43:12 UTC
Permalink
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 05:16:59 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:

Live To Spend It ! http://preview.xrl.in/4z9q
John Clear
2010-04-14 03:41:53 UTC
Permalink
In article <mike-***@news.eternal-september.org>,
Mike Ash <***@mikeash.com> wrote:
>
>It's typically gelcoat on fiberglass which is definitely not what you'll
>find on a typical Cessna. I don't know how a composite powered aircraft
>like, say, a Cirrus would compare. There probably aren't too many
>Cirruses kept tied out in the sun either, though.

I fly out of Palo Alto, CA, which is very short of hangars, and there
are bunch of Cirruses tied down in the sun, as well some Diamond
DA-40/42s. Doesn't seem to be a problem, but I don't know if the
blend of composites is the same as used in gliders.

John
--
John Clear - ***@panix.com http://www.clear-prop.org/
Mark
2010-04-13 19:31:47 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 09:03:21 -0700 (PDT), ***@gmail.com wrote:
Loading...